Sign up for free to use this document yourself.

  • paradox of increase@fundamental level.

  • The problem of identity inheritance

  • Setup

  • What’s wrong with it?

  • Some observations

    describe and characterize the situation.

    WEIRDNESS at the fundamental level.

  • My verdict

  • The paradox

  • The fundamental level

  • Give a detailed explanation of why the standard solutions do not work at the fundamental level.

  • The theseusian problem at the fundamental level.

  • 1. Either nihilism or mereological essentialism is true for the fundamental increment (Fi)

    After Fi, the option for increase is open for the first time.

  • A simple cannot grow, but a composite can grow.

  • The idea of increase as a commonsense notion

  • The idea is logically impossible, however, unless great metaphysical costs are accepted.

    In this section, give the details of the various available solutions and the attendant costs.

  • ????all solutions are not possible at the fundamental level.

    because they require that the original part is a composite, but at the fundamental level the original part is not a composite.

  • What is the fundamental level?

    The fundamental level is the level of the metaphysical atoms.

  • Sparse ontology
    Burke
    Constitutionalism
    Four-dimensionalism

  • Sparse ontology

  • Burke

  • Constitutionalism

  • Four-dimensionalism

  • [to be expanded]

  • Is there a fundamental level?

    If there is a fundamental level…

  • different analysis of simples

  • solution

  • costs

  • solution

  • costs

{"cards":[{"_id":"42db84faf4d8cd1d6000000f","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":10692,"position":1,"parentId":null,"content":"paradox of increase@fundamental level."},{"_id":"42db9c57f4d8cd1d60000010","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":10684,"position":5,"parentId":"42db84faf4d8cd1d6000000f","content":"Setup"},{"_id":"42ddec2462cd4179da00001b","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":10689,"position":2,"parentId":"42db9c57f4d8cd1d60000010","content":"The paradox"},{"_id":"42ddf01b62cd4179da00001d","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":10858,"position":1,"parentId":"42ddec2462cd4179da00001b","content":"The idea of increase as a commonsense notion"},{"_id":"5d998bb59d8cd3d43d000032","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":5031768,"position":1.125,"parentId":"42ddec2462cd4179da00001b","content":""},{"_id":"42ddf3ae62cd4179da000020","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":10862,"position":1.25,"parentId":"42ddec2462cd4179da00001b","content":"The idea is logically impossible, however, unless great metaphysical costs are accepted.\n\nIn this section, give the details of the various available solutions and the attendant costs."},{"_id":"42ddf71162cd4179da000021","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":10880,"position":1,"parentId":"42ddf3ae62cd4179da000020","content":"Sparse ontology"},{"_id":"42de1861b891381e74000027","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":10899,"position":1,"parentId":"42ddf71162cd4179da000021","content":"solution"},{"_id":"42de18cab891381e74000028","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":10900,"position":2,"parentId":"42ddf71162cd4179da000021","content":"costs"},{"_id":"42de147ab891381e74000024","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":10887,"position":2.5,"parentId":"42ddf3ae62cd4179da000020","content":"Burke"},{"_id":"42de14f2b891381e74000025","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":10889,"position":1,"parentId":"42de147ab891381e74000024","content":"solution"},{"_id":"42de159fb891381e74000026","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":10890,"position":2,"parentId":"42de147ab891381e74000024","content":"costs"},{"_id":"42de083a62cd4179da000027","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":10818,"position":4,"parentId":"42ddf3ae62cd4179da000020","content":"Constitutionalism"},{"_id":"42de08e862cd4179da000028","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":10815,"position":5,"parentId":"42ddf3ae62cd4179da000020","content":"Four-dimensionalism"},{"_id":"42de1a06b891381e74000029","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":10931,"position":1.375,"parentId":"42ddec2462cd4179da00001b","content":"**????all solutions are not possible at the fundamental level.**\n\nbecause they require that the original part is a composite, but at the fundamental level the original part is not a composite."},{"_id":"42de25a6b891381e7400002b","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":10933,"position":1,"parentId":"42de1a06b891381e74000029","content":"[to be expanded]"},{"_id":"42ddecaa62cd4179da00001c","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":10697,"position":3,"parentId":"42db9c57f4d8cd1d60000010","content":"The fundamental level"},{"_id":"42de2021b891381e7400002a","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":10916,"position":1,"parentId":"42ddecaa62cd4179da00001c","content":"What is the fundamental level?\n\nThe fundamental level is the level of the metaphysical atoms."},{"_id":"42de2f16b891381e7400002c","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":10935,"position":1,"parentId":"42de2021b891381e7400002a","content":"Is there a fundamental level?\n\nIf there is a fundamental level..."},{"_id":"42de30ebb891381e7400002d","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":10936,"position":2,"parentId":"42de2021b891381e7400002a","content":"different analysis of simples"},{"_id":"42dde8ed62cd4179da000018","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":13412,"position":5.375,"parentId":"42db84faf4d8cd1d6000000f","content":"What's wrong with it?"},{"_id":"42de77d8b891381e74000035","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":12909,"position":0.5,"parentId":"42dde8ed62cd4179da000018","content":"Give a detailed explanation of why the standard solutions do not work at the fundamental level. "},{"_id":"42e49b1441da8ea14d00002a","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":12910,"position":1,"parentId":"42de77d8b891381e74000035","content":"Sparse ontology\nBurke\nConstitutionalism\nFour-dimensionalism"},{"_id":"42df11ccd27ef4d3ff000031","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":12895,"position":0.75,"parentId":"42dde8ed62cd4179da000018","content":"The theseusian problem at the fundamental level."},{"_id":"42ddea6b62cd4179da000019","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":11149,"position":5.75,"parentId":"42db84faf4d8cd1d6000000f","content":"Some observations\n\ndescribe and characterize the situation.\n\nWEIRDNESS at the fundamental level."},{"_id":"42de37a7b891381e7400002f","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":12869,"position":1,"parentId":"42ddea6b62cd4179da000019","content":"\n##1. Either nihilism or mereological essentialism is true for the **fundamental increment (Fi)**\n\nAfter Fi, the option for increase is open for the first time."},{"_id":"42e0051f9975c95063000029","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":11677,"position":2,"parentId":"42ddea6b62cd4179da000019","content":"A simple cannot grow, but a composite can grow."},{"_id":"42ddeaf562cd4179da00001a","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":10688,"position":5.875,"parentId":"42db84faf4d8cd1d6000000f","content":"My verdict"},{"_id":"42df25d0d27ef4d3ff000032","treeId":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","seq":11159,"position":2,"parentId":null,"content":"The problem of identity inheritance"}],"tree":{"_id":"42db84e3f4d8cd1d6000000d","name":"fundincrease","publicUrl":"fundincrease"}}