Your browser doesn't support the features required by impress.js, so you are presented with a simplified version of this presentation.

For the best experience please use the latest Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser.

Hyperloop Alpha - Summary

To travel between cities less that 1500 km apart, a bullet train in a low pressure tube is the safest, fastest, and most efficient option. (beyond that distance, supersonic air travel is likely faster & cheaper).


Current transport (rail, road, water, air), are either slow, expensive, or both. Hyperloop is both fast and cheap. It is being developed as an open source project.

The Hyperloop sends capsules through a low pressure tube. The capsules are supported by a cushion of air, and are accelerated via magnetic linear accelerators. The tubes are above-ground. Passengers enter and exit Hyperloop at stations at the ends, or at branches along the tube.

This study presents the preliminary design for a Hyperloop between Los Angeles and San Fransisco. Total trip time is ~30 min, with capsules carrying 28 people, at 480kph (in urban areas) and at 1,220 kph along the Interstate, running as often as every 30 seconds.

Cost is projected to be $6 billion dollars, which (amortized over 20yrs) amounts to ~$20 plus operating costs per one-way passenger ticket.


The capsules will carry ~28 people, for a capacity of 840 passengers per hour. The system will need 40 capsules during rush hour, 6 of which will be at the terminals for loading/unloading passengers (~5 min).

The key features of the capsule are:

  1. the aerodynamics
  2. the compressor
  3. the suspension air cushion
  4. onboard power
  5. onboard linear motor

(two versions of the capsule are proposed: passenger only, and passenger & vehicle. Design parameters for both are presented).


In brief, the capsule is a streamlined body slightly smaller than the tube, with a frontal compressor.

The maximum width of the capsule is 1.35 m, the max height is 1.10 m. The overall weight is ~3100 kg. Total cost should be no more that $245,000.

The frontal area is minimal, and streamlined to reduce drag. The compressor at the front ingests oncoming air. Aerodynamic simulations support the ‘compressor in a tube’ concept.

Simulations support the validity of the ‘compressor within a tube’ concept.


A frontal compressor allows the capsule to move through the tube without choking the air in front, and supplies air to the suspension air bearings. The power is generated by 2,500 kg of batteries.


The onboard compressor serves two purposes: 1) to allow the capsule to move through the tube without choking the flow of air around the capsule. 2) To supply air to the air bearings that support the weight of the capsule.

Further details on the compressor, including schematics, can be found in the original PDF.


Summary: The suspension behaves like an air hockey table (except it’s the puck that creates the air cushion).

Suspending the capsule within the tube is a challenge, due to transonic crusing velocities.

Magnetic levitation is a viable solution, but the construction costs are prohibitive. Air bearings suspension offers stability and low drag, at feasible cost, by exploiting the ambient atmosphere in the tube.

Externally pressurized air bearings are suitable, due to the high stiffness required to maintain stability at high speeds. When the gap between ski and tube shrinks, the flow field pushes back strongly.

This stiffness is superb for reliability and safety, but in order to account for passenger comfort, must be paired with an independent mechanical suspension for a smoother ride.

Each capsule will have 28 air bearing skis that conform to tube walls. Each will be 1.5 m x 0.9 m, floating on a pressurized cushion of air 0.5 to 1.3 mm off the ground. (pressurized relative the environment… peak pressure is only 1.4 psi or 9% of atmospheric).

Onboard power

The passenger capsule power system includes an estimated 2,500 kg of batteries to power the onboard compressor and capsule systems in addition to the compressor motor and coolant.

The battery, motor, and electronic components cost is estimated to be near $150,000 per capsule in addition to the cost of the suspension system.

Interior Concept

Comfortable seats that conform to the body are important due to the high accelerations. Landscapes will be displayed in the cabin, and passengers will have personal entertainment systems.

The total cost of the interior for a passenger-only model should be no more than $255,000.


The tube will be at a pressure of 100 Pa (0.015 psi). This pressure is low enough to reduce drag, but not so high that it requires complex industrial vacuum pumps to maintain.

The tube will be elevated on pillars, to reduce footprint & land requirements.

Cutaway of the tube system.
Tube is suspended above-ground to
minimize land requirements.


Rand Corporation and ET3 have also proposed a hard vacuum system, with electromagnetic suspension. The challenge with this approach is the extreme difficulty of maintaining vacuum in a 700 mile tube with dozens of gateways, and thousands of pods entering and exiting daily.


The propulsion system has these basic requirements:

  1. Accelerate capsule from 0 to 480 kph.
  2. Maintain capsule at 480 kph as necessary, (including during slope ascents).
  3. Accelerate the capsule from 480 to 1,220 kph at 1g.
  4. Decelerate the capsule back to 480 kph at end of coasting section.

Hyperloop uses a linear induction motor to accomplish this. The capsule will contain the ‘rotor’ part, while the tube contains the ‘stator’ part.


The main challenge for a capsule moving down a tube, is the air in front of it. If the tube is too narrow, air cannot flow around the capsule, and it behaves like a syringe. This can be overcome by placing a compressor fan at the front, which also provides air for the suspension cushion underneath the capsule.

Other challenges include cost, earthquakes, thermal & geological expansion/contraction, and energy considerations. Ideas for overcoming them are presented. In fact, for energy considerations, placing solar panels on top of the tube can generate far more energy than the system requires.


Hyperloop will allow LA to SF travel in 35 minutes.

The key constraints on the route are:

  1. Follow as close as possible to rights of way (e.g. I-5)
  2. Max capsule speed of 1220 kph
  3. Max acceleration to 0.5g
  4. Optimized location of linear motor tube segments.
  5. Geography (urban, mountain, parks, airports, etc).

The capsules will travel at 480 kph where geography requires many bends (start/end), and at 1220 where the route is straighter (mid section, along I-5).

Safety and Reliability

In many cases, Hyperloop is intrinsically safer than airplanes, trains, or cars.

Hyperloop is an integrated system; everything from the vehicle, propulsion system, energy, timings, and route, are controlled. The system is immune to weather.

The propulsion system is integrated into the tube sections and is incapable of accelerating the capsule to speeds that are unsafe for that given section.

With weather & human error removed from the system, few safety concerns remain.


Total cost is < $6 billion for the passenger only system. (passenger + vehicle would cost $7.5 billion).

Component         |  Cost (millions)
Capsules (x 40)   |     54
Tube              |  5,410
Cost Margin       |    536
Total             |  6,000


A high speed transportation system known as Hyperloop has been developed in this document. The work has detailed two version of the Hyperloop: a passenger only version and a passenger plus vehicle version. Hyperloop could transport people, vehicles, and freight between Los Angeles and San Francisco in 35 minutes. Transporting 7.4 million people each way and amortizing the cost of $6 billion over 20 years gives a ticket price of $20 for a one-way trip for the passenger version of Hyperloop.

The passenger plus vehicle version of the Hyperloop is less than 9% of the cost of the proposed passenger only high speed rail system between Los Angeles and San Francisco.


Useful feedback is welcomed on aspects of the Hyperloop design. E-mail
feedback to or

Future Work

Hyperloop is considered an open source transportation concept. The authors encourage all members of the community to contribute to the Hyperloop design process. Iteration of the design by various individuals and groups can help bring Hyperloop from an idea to a reality.

The authors recognize the need for additional work, including but not limited to:

  1. More expansion on the control mechanism for Hyperloop capsules,
    including attitude thruster or control moment gyros.
  2. Detailed station designs with loading and unloading of both passenger
    and passenger plus vehicle versions of the Hyperloop capsules.
  3. Trades comparing the costs and benefits of Hyperloop with more
    conventional magnetic levitation systems.
  4. Sub-scale testing based on a further optimized design to demonstrate
    the physics of Hyperloop.

Control Mechanisms

Station design

Comparison to maglev

Sub-scale testing

This document

This is a Gingko tree summary of the “Hyperloop Alpha” document (PDF).